Explores beyond the landing page
Recus follows same-origin routes and newly revealed interface states instead of stopping at the first screen.
Autonomous quality assurance
Autonomous QA for web apps
Give every release a first-pass QA sweep without specifying every path in advance. Recus explores your web application in a real browser, adapts when the interface changes, and returns evidence-backed findings for your team to review.
What Recus does
From an open browser to a report your team can act on.
Exercises real interactions
It clicks, fills, scrolls, and validates flows in a real browser using the UI a customer sees.
Returns reviewable evidence
Findings include context such as screenshots, browser recordings, traces, and an action log so a person can verify the result.
How it works
A first pass in three moves.
- 01 / 03
Point Recus at a URL
Use a staging, preview, or production URL that the agent can reach.
- 02 / 03
The agent maps and tests
Recus studies the interface, proposes useful checks, runs them, and continues into discovered paths.
- 03 / 03
Your team reviews the report
Inspect passed checks, warnings, failures, and supporting evidence before deciding what to fix or automate permanently.
Why teams use it
More breadth. Better evidence. Human judgment stays in charge.
- 01Broader first-pass coverage without defining every case
- 02Faster feedback on unfamiliar or fast-changing releases
- 03Reproducible evidence instead of an unexplained failure count
- 04More time for QA specialists to focus on risk and product judgment
Useful for
Where this workflow earns its keep.
Preview-deploy checks
Run a broad UI sweep before a branch or release is merged.
Release sanity testing
Check core paths after deployment without rebuilding a manual checklist every time.
New-surface discovery
Explore an unfamiliar product area before investing in a permanent scripted suite.
QA team leverage
Delegate repetitive exploration while keeping triage and release decisions with people.
Practical guidance
Autonomous does not mean unattended judgment
Recus automates exploration and evidence collection; it does not make the final release decision. A human reviewer still decides whether a finding is a defect, an acceptable product behavior, or a test that needs more context.
That division of work makes autonomous QA useful as a coverage multiplier. The agent does the broad, mechanical sweep while engineers and testers apply product knowledge to the results.
FAQ
Questions, answered.
What is autonomous QA?+
Autonomous QA uses an agent to inspect an application, choose relevant interactions and checks, execute them, and report findings with less up-front scripting than a traditional automated suite.
Does autonomous QA replace QA engineers?+
No. Recus handles broad exploration and evidence collection. QA engineers still provide product context, assess risk, verify findings, and decide what should block a release.
Can Recus test staging and preview environments?+
Yes, when the URL and required flows are reachable from the Recus browser session. The same workflow can be used for accessible staging, preview, and production surfaces.
How is this different from a scripted test suite?+
A scripted suite repeats flows the team has already defined. Recus is designed to explore and propose checks from the interface, which helps reveal paths the team may not have anticipated.
Ready for a first pass?